The River
September 21, 2006I’ve been a big Bruce Springsteen fan all my life, since I was in kindergarten and my oldest brother played Born to Run all the time. As I’ve aged (not to say matured), I’ve come to appreciate the subtleties of Springsteen’s lyrics at least as much as the in-your-face simplicity of his music. His attention to (white) working class experience reflects a set of political commitments that run deeper than just shilling for Kerry in 2004, and I have significantly more respect for him politically than I do for any other gazillionaire rock star Democratic Party cheerleader.
When I first met several former members of STO a decade ago, I quickly learned that a couple of them were huge Springsteen fans. I discovered that they too were impressed both by his take on rock-n-roll, and by the tales of working class life that populated albums like Darkness on the Edge of Town and Nebraska. (One of these members recently told me that the Kansas City branch of STO leafleted the local stop on the Born to Run tour in 1977 – when I was running around my parents’ house in pajamas listening to my brother’s new favorite record – although she was unable to locate the leaflet in question.)
So, as I’ve pursued my research, I often find myself pairing stories of STO with songs by Bruce Springsteen. Songs like “Youngstown” are obvious enough parallels to the deindustrialization that plagued STO throughout its existence. But there are others. As one example, consider the lyrics to the song “The River:”
I come from down in the valley
where mister when you’re young
They bring you up to do like your daddy done
Me and Mary we met in high school
when she was just seventeen
We’d ride out of that valley down to where the fields were green
We’d go down to the river
And into the river we’d dive
Oh down to the river we’d ride
Then I got Mary pregnant
and man that was all she wrote
And for my nineteenth birthday I got a union card and a wedding coat
We went down to the courthouse
and the judge put it all to rest
No wedding day smiles no walk down the aisle
No flowers no wedding dress
That night we went down to the river
And into the river we’d dive
Oh down to the river we did ride
I got a job working construction for the Johnstown Company
But lately there ain’t been much work on account of the economy
Now all them things that seemed so important
Well mister they vanished right into the air
Now I just act like I don’t remember
Mary acts like she don’t care
But I remember us riding in my brother’s car
Her body tan and wet down at the reservoir
At night on them banks I’d lie awake
And pull her close just to feel each breath she’d take
Now those memories come back to haunt me
they haunt me like a curse
Is a dream a lie if it don’t come true
Or is it something worse
that sends me down to the river
though I know the river is dry
That sends me down to the river tonight
Down to the river
my baby and I
Oh down to the river we ride
On one level, this is a simple story of frustration and nostalgia, but on another level it is clearly a metaphor for the broad process of working class dislocation that was the result of deindustrialization in the seventies and eighties. The dream of working class “success” was in tatters: no longer did heavy industry provide a guaranteed job from youth to retirement, or even retirement benefits for those who had been raised to “do like your daddy done.” Undoubtedly, lay-offs and plant closures led to any number of broken and dysfunctional marriages, but the relationship described in the song also reflects social realities of patriarchy and alienation under capitalism.
At the risk of reading too much into a single song, I will add one more layer of metaphor, this one obviously unintended by Springsteen. In the interviews I have done as part of my research, I have frequently encountered a sense of nostalgic longing for the optimism of the past. In some cases this nostalgia reflects a conscious awareness of the toll that deindustrialization had on STO’s early commitment to working class power at the point of production. In others, the longing is simply for the open revolutionary horizons of the early seventies (or even, in some cases, the late seventies, at least as compared to the rightward shift of the eighties). While most interviewees are still engaged politically, the nostalgic undercurrent I’ve encountered is perhaps typified by a preliminary question asked of me by one long-time member I approached for an interview: “Do you still have hope?”
My answer was an emphatic “yes,” but the question still haunts me, as I reflect on my own history of failed projects and lost optimism. Another long time member said to me, “It took us [STO members] twenty years to burn out; you anarchists only took ten.” True enough, at least for some of us, and for the time being. But many of us keep heading back down to the river of activism, hoping that it doesn’t run dry.

mike,
i wonder if the STO member who said it only took 10 years for the anarchists to burn out felt that they (STO members) had burnt out because of time or conditions. because if burn out is only due to time, then yeah we sure did burn out quick. but if is due to conditions, then maybe it is amazing that we lasted so long.
sometimes i gasp in amazement the (white for the most part) working class reality that existed in the 60s. Go to community college, pick up factory job during the summer and have enough money for all year round. the consideration to “industralize” was a choice because the doors were so wide open. most of the anarchists i know and hang with aren’t working class because it was a collective choice (although that does exist- but i would say less so than in the socialist sects), but it was the fucking best or only jobs we could get.
also i wonder what family environment existed in the STO. After 20 years of hardcore activism did they have a lot of families in their ranks (i.e. people with kids). i feel my totally dropping out has more to do with two kids and the inability of the left to address this universal human reality than any lack of anger or desire.
Comment by jason — September 25, 2006 @ 9:02 pm
Hey Jason,
These are great questions, and they get to the heart of what I was trying to say in a couple ways. I absolutely agree that the question of time can’t be isolated from circumstances, and that the circumstances of the small nineties upsurge in anarchist momentum were a far cry from the lingering effects the sixties exerted on groups like STO and other activists in the seventies and even eighties.
This is true not only in the political/activist realm, but also, as you suggest, in the economic realm as well. This is another manifestation of the effect of deindustrialization and the other economic changes of the past three or four decades. For what it’s worth, the same ex-STO’er who commented on burnout also noted the economic circumstances you’re talking about, pointing out that when things are good (both economically and politically) that radicals can deal well with various hardships and maintain momentum.
As for family, it is certainly true that as the membership of STO matured, children did come into the picture. I haven’t been able to determine whether this contributed to people leaving the group, but you are not the first to point out the left’s general either/or approach to kids and activism. Sofia has certainly been part of my own sense of withdrawal.
Solidarity,
Mike
Comment by Mike — September 26, 2006 @ 6:57 pm
Mike,
This post is fucking great. On the post and the discussion, these kinds of concerns are a lot of what got me interested in the Italian operaismo stuff initially, the stuff on class composition analysis. I think the nostalgia and engagement/inspiration stuff is also related to general issues about the use of history, why read it and why try to write it or otherwise share it.
take care,
Nate
Comment by Nate — September 28, 2006 @ 5:26 am
FYI - We in Kansas City did in fact leaflet that concert and our leaflet (which I have somewhere in some box) in fact utilized lyrics from Bruce’s songs and was one of my favorite all time leaflets. It was 8 and 1/2 folded like a booklet with graphics. The KC branch was very much into rock and punk at the time.
Comment by randy — September 29, 2006 @ 11:37 pm
These comments have been invaluable to me as is this whole site. I thank you for your comment.
Comment by Rosie — April 30, 2007 @ 2:34 pm